Porticol vs Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch is a web-first API client with desktop apps. Porticol is a native API client that works offline with no account, keeps collections in Git, and lets your coding agents run them over MCP. Every fact about Hoppscotch below cites its source, checked on 20 Oct 2026.

PorticolHoppscotch
Free planFree for up to 3 seats1Free, with a personal workspace and the collection runner2
Paid plansTeam $12, Business $24, Enterprise $48 a seat a month1Business $6, Enterprise $11 a user a month, billed annually2
Use it without an accountYes, the desktop app needs no account and no network3Yes; signing in is for syncing between devices4
Collections kept on your computerYes, in one SQLite file on your computer3Yes, in local session storage or the desktop app4
Collections as files in GitYes, linked to a folder in a Git repository as readable files5Not stated4
MCP server for coding agentsYes, built in, read-only until you allow writes6On the Business cloud plan or a self-hosted instance, with an account27
CLI for CIYes, porticol-cli with JUnit, JSON and HTML reports8Yes, the Hoppscotch CLI4

Sources

Speed on the same Mac

Hoppscotch is not in our benchmark run yet; see how we measured for the apps it covers.

Where Hoppscotch is stronger

Switching from Hoppscotch

Porticol imports Postman collections and environments, Insomnia v4, OpenAPI 3, HAR and cURL; see Import.

Get early access

Other comparisons